Deception in a dumbed-down environment
Our fast-food culture could be robbing Christian believers of the ability to discern between truth and error.
first printed in Sword magazine June 2010
A three-time telling
I was advised when teaching students: 'First tell them what you are going to tell them; then tell them; and then tell them what you've told them'. Basically the instruction was on reinforcement by repetition. Two thousand years ago the 'threefold' emphasis was employed by Jesus to stress a particular element of His teaching; that of 'deception'.
From the Garden of Eden ('Did God really say? Gen 3:1) to the end of days, deception has been, is and will be one of the principal tools in the enemy's armoury. So when Jesus' disciples asked 'what will be the sign of your coming and the end of the age?' the first thing he said was: 'Watch out that no one deceives you. For many will come in my name, claiming, "I am the Christ," and will deceive many' (Matt 24:4-5).
It is surely significant that the Son of God saw deception as the primary hallmark of the end times. And yet, in the first instance, deception is a personal an invisible process: it is difficult to spot. It could well be argued that Jesus would have been better directing his first words towards the global and extremely obvious upheavals on the earth - earthquakes, wars, famine and death.
Of course Jesus went on to do so (Matt 24:6-7), but even then he returned to his first theme: 'many false prophets will appear and deceive many people' (Matt 24:11). So the second iteration even took precedence over the dire forecast of 'great distress, unequalled from the beginning of the world until now - and never to be equalled again' (Matt 24:21).
"deception ... the primary hallmark of the end times"
Even before mention of cosmic upheavals involving the sun and stars (Matt 24:29) the problem of deception was given a third highlighting by God's Son: 'For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect ' (Matt 24:24).
So it seems the 'three times' approach was used by the greatest teacher of all time. The dangers of deception is a theme also reinforced to us by the New Testament writers. Paul encourages us to emulate his awareness 'lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices' (2 Cor 2:11 KJV).
The apostle wrote to his young companion Timothy: 'evil men and imposters will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived' (2 Tim 3:13). And he urges the believers at Ephesus to maturity so that they will no longer be 'blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming' (Eph 4:14). John tells us that 'many deceivers... have gone out into the world' (2 John 2:7) and that those characteristics are of the anti (alternative) Christ. Indeed during the Millennial reign of Christ, Satan the ultimate liar and sponsor of 'false apostles, deceitful workmen (2 Cor. 11:13), who 'masquerades as an angel of light' (2 Cor. 11:14) is thrown into the Abyss 'to keep him from deceiving the nations any more' (Rev.
"attention spans have reduced to that of the sound bite or video clip"
So how does this increase in deception fit into our post-modern society and contemporary church? Apart from robbing our nation of basic cookery skills, our microwave culture has both stripped out the need to put thought and effort into a task whilst also creating a need for easy and instant results. ("Lord give me patience, but give it to me now".) Aiding and abetting the enervating impact of the 'instant' culture is the extent to which our attention spans have reduced to that of the sound bite or video clip. (Even national governments are disseminating their most important messages via 5-minute YouTube videos on the internet.)
Meanwhile the written word is often reduced to a phonetically-spelt text message. Now I don't want to come across as a self-righteous stone-age Luddite who sees every innovation and change as a threat, but my great concern is for a society which increasingly is being stripped of both the ability and incentives to listen, concentrate, read, write, spell or think. And Christians are not immune.
In the hyper-active busyness of life, pew-sitting can become merely a chance for a rest. And the practice permits churchgoers to forego the study God's word for themselves. It's easier just to 'turn up' on a Sunday each week to be spoon fed by a preacher who has done the work for us. It's not good.
It gets worse. Twenty years ago Bible study groups studied, well. .. the Bible. The teaching could be from one from the prophets, the synoptic gospels or the pastoral epistles. But no matter which it was from the Bible. However, things have changed. Doctrine, or should I say pseudo-doctrine, is being taken from pages of the latest Christian best-seller or successful programme.
Now please stay with me here. I am not decrying books written by human authors: I have been greatly helped by the many writings on my shelf. However things have gone too far when the Bible becomes a mere 'add on' to the latest 'new thing' circulating within the church in a best-selling format. (Increasingly some of these publications are become industries in their own right.)
And, if it hasn't already arrived at a house group near you, one of the most influential of recent days has been dubbed 'the Emerging Church'. However, without embarking at this stage on any analysis of this current phenomenon, let me say that the first (and major) problem is the expression lacks adequate definition. It has all the woolly inexactitude of 'The New Age' or 'Charismatic' or 'Post-Modern'. And to attempt a definition of the Emerging Church (just to confuse things further there is a sub-set called the Emergent Church) is like trying to pin a jelly to the wall: it keeps eluding one's grasp.
Proponents will dress up the term in one set of clothes in order to extol its virtues, whilst critics will seize upon a different caricature and proceed to denounce it in the most scathing of terms. The trouble is (and leaving terminology aside) the Emerging Church is a mixed bag: a mixed bag of belief, practices, philosophies and teachings.
And it's when we get to 'mixtures' that deception gets very difficult to spot.
A deadly mix
Some years ago, during a Christian leaders' conference, the speaker for one session covered the topic of discerning truth from falsehood. To illustrate a particular point he asked those present to turn around in their chairs and, from where they were seated, say whether the flowers in the vase at the back corner of the room were real or artificial.
The gathering dutifully complied and, after a brief pause while each person formed an opinion, a babble of mixed opinions broke out: 'I think they're real' 'No, they're not.' 'Yes they are!' Confusion reigned. 'Hold it', cried the speaker, 'I have made my point.'
The truth of the matter, as the Bible teacher went on to outline, was that while the vase contained some real flowers, others in the array were completely artificial. So the varied responses of the conference delegates revealed two important points -
* each person made a judgment on the basis of the particular flower on which his or her eyes first fell as being real or plastic
* each then assumed that all the other flowers were either genuine or artificial based on their first observation In the evaluation process each person argued from the particular (flower) to the general (floral display).
So part of the lesson (which the speaker's little exercise very aptly illustrated) was that we are all prone to focus on what is a small element of a bigger picture or situation and then, having come to a view, extrapolate our initial opinion and argue from the micro to the macro on the assumption that the whole scene is homogenous – the same throughout.
The very important point being made by the conference speaker was (and is) that one of the biggest perils Christians face is when (some) truth is mixed in with error. Outright error - when it is presented - is usually obvious as such, and should not, for mature biblical Christians, be so very difficult to spot. But when it is masquerading as the real thing and mixed in with the authentic, then the danger is immense.
Partial truth is....partial
"grossly misleading ..... to emphasise the love of God apart from the righteous judgements of God."
Partial truths just won't do But there is another trap and error into which Christians are inclined to fall. A believer might spot false teachings but we are all perhaps less likely to spot omissions: his or her background knowledge subconsciously 'fills in the blanks'. So if one or more parts of an apparently successful evangelistic programme are biblical, we accept the whole. Yet it is a serious error to preach on the atonement, whilst leaving out the doctrines of sin and repentance.
It is grossly misleading for a so-called 'missional' church to emphasise the love of God apart from the righteous judgements of God. In a court of law witnesses are put on oath to speak 'the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth'. And so it should be. Anything less or anything more is a lie.
An expert whose job it was to spot counterfeit currency was once asked what skills he needed to be effective and sharp-eyed in this work of identifying forged banknotes. His reply? 'I conscientiously study the real thing'. Whatever teachings, new things, apparently successful schemes, or best-selling publications are circulating amongst God's people, the instruction for each and every one of Jesus' followers is Paul's injunction to 'be Bereans' (Acts 17:11).
At the end of the day we need to take the time and trouble, and make the effort to study God's Word for ourselves. We need to be led by a personal intimate knowledge of 'the real thing'. But this takes work. Diligent and persistent effort is needed.
My friend's father was of a generation and type such that when he came home from work in the evening he would sit by the fire with the Bible on his knee, and read and meditate on the Word of God for his own life. He would then communicate Scripture's eternal truths to his children and also encourage them think through things for themselves. Have we lost something in our 'fast food' culture? Has the reduced time, inclinations and abilities of our age given the enemy of God great scope for falsehood and deception?
In a fast-moving world there will always be things 'emerging'. (Paradoxically there is nothing new under the sun.) So let's be open to how we best spread the Gospel, but let's also be absolutely certain that it is the Gospel we are spreading .
Let's be very careful that our message and our understanding are based on the Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth. This is what we need to do. So help us God.
The Editor, 10/04/2015
||Truth Seeker (Guest)
What if the diligent seeker has been robbed of any truthful gauge on and by which he/she might judge a lie?
What if the very Bible which he/she is using to discern a lie has been previously adulterated by the hands of deceived men?
What then ?
If a person seeks to know the true gospel - which Bible is he to believe?
For example the KJV presents Galatans 2/16 as follows:
Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
But the NIV presents the same scripture in a different way:
know that a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law, because by the works of the law no one will be justified.
The KJV refers to the faith OF Christ, while the NIV refers to faith IN Christ.
I'm sure you will agree there is a big difference between having the faith OF Christ...and having faith IN Christ.
To have the Faith OF Christ implies that the recipient has been gifted that faith by Christ, but to have faith IN Christ implies that the person must exercise a faith sourced in his/her own being towards Christ.
A big difference!!!
Indeed, all the diffeence between the true, biblically based gospel and a false 'Arminian' type gospel
|Truth Seeker I am quite prepared to dialogue with you on-line provided you make yourself known to me. The main reason for making this stipulation is that there appears to be at least one person 'out there' with all the characteristics of an anti-charismatic, King James only, hyper-calvinist who lacks the integrity and honesty of making themselves known.
Rather they hide behind a succession of psuedonyms while pursuing their fixation (to the annoyance of the vast majority).
So to remove any possibility of being seen to fit that description, please do make yourself known.
|Due to continuing abuse of this response facility by anonymous persons please note that only (logged on) registered site members can post.
|This article was written by the Editor (in another capacity) some time ago to highlight the growing problem of deception - a principal hallmark of the end times. The 'response' facility restriction remains in place because of the continuing problem detailed in the post of 05/05/2014.
|I'm glad this article has been re published - it should stay at the top of the list to encourage people to start discussing Truth. I don't necessarily agree with the article when it seeks to blame our "dumb downed culture" or fast food but the subject of Truth is probably more important than anything else for us.
Just to comment on what Truth Seeker is saying: too many people confuse truth with a small "t" with Truth with a capital "T". It has been said that the bible is the truth about the Truth. One of the most important (though dull!) verses in the bible about establishing Truth is:
“One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: AT THE MOUTH OF TWO WITNESSES, OR AT THE MOUTH OF THREE WITNESSES, SHALL THE MATTER BE ESTABLISHED” Deut 19:15
So, Truth Seeker, you need to pay attention to the written word of the bible – but that is only one witness. What is the Spirit of God saying in your heart about what you are reading? That is the second witness. (there can be others too). I have always had a house full of bibles and never had a problem if one seems different to another. I let God speak to me in all of them. The reason that we have so many different books in the bible, four gospels, and many different writers. Truth is not that which is spelt out letter by letter in the bible, but what God is saying to us through that written word.
As far as texts and social media are concerned, there are, thank God, many Christians rising to the challenge of communicating truth by this means. We are increasingly living in a dumbed-down world, but before we get too sanctimonious about it, we need to have compassion on the people, who are harassed, badly paid, having to work long hours, having to return to work instead of staying at home to raise and teach their children. Think about the Christians in China, whose schedules are much worse than ours and who often don't have access to a bible. Does this cut them off from Truth? St Paul was in prison, but he said "The Word of God is not bound".
It is really important that each Christian who can, study the bible and listen to what God is saying to their own hearts though. Don't be a foolish virgin and rely on what the Pastor, or other Christians have. Many Christians will fall away soon including leaders. You must have your own.
That leads to another problem about Truth: it is the "sword that goes through our own hearts also". It is an acquired taste. It involves the death of self - or perhaps the death of how we like to see ourselves.
Truth is the most awful (in the real sense of the word) thing in existence. The bible says that the antichrist will be allowed to "cast the truth down to the ground". God can allow that because Truth remains what it is - you can put an illusion between yourself and It, but you cannot change it, you can do nothing to it. satan is petrified of it. It is the reason we exist - or rather live, and the reason why if we are in the truth nothing can snuff us out, even if we die.