Covid Blindness or Willful Denial
Sudden Adult Death syndrome and extremely serious vaccine harms; apparent unwillingness face the facts?
PREFACE: The Covid injections were first introduced in late 2020: since then, the totally-unprecedented scale of injury and death has been immense. Yet through to the present day – with extremely few exceptions – church leaders and Christian organisations have remained utterly silent on the most serious dangers of these medical treatments and the diabolical agenda behind it. Indeed some have even endorsed the injections while others have encouraged and even facilitated the roll-outs. Mike Yeadon - a former Pfizer VP - has spoken of what we are seeing as "the biggest crime in history".
 The most disturbing example of failure within the Christian community to sound the alarm is that of the Christian Medical Fellowship, which has repeatedly declined to engage with and respond to the concerns expressed to it.
In general terms, the vast majority of front-line physicians seem to have abandoned their medical ethics, broken the Hippocratic Oath and failed to employ the moral, ethical and professional practice of informed consent. (See also Postscript.)
A recent symposium entitled 'Covid 19 and the Church' "brought together over 60 evangelical Christians from across the UK to explore lessons learnt and reflections from the pandemic affecting churches". This was indeed a highly-commendable and very useful exercise. However, with a contributing CMF member present at that symposium the 3-hour event on 12 Dec. 2023, conspicuously failed, in any meaningful way, to address the elephant in the room. This silence very sadly stands in stark contrast with the 'secular prophets' and the lonely but brave voices in the medical establishment and the corridors of power.
Just as most of the church(es) were silent when the Jews were being led away in the 1940s, we are seeing the same thing happening now.
This is truly a Bonhoeffer moment in the face of a what the Nazis did in the 1940s. However this time it is on a global scale.
The following article first appeared in the The Conservative Woman (TCW).
----------------------------------
COVID BLINDNESS or DOUBLE VISION
by Colin Wilson - September 17, 2023
 OVER the last three years, massive numbers around the globe have demonstrated the apparent inability to contemplate the scale of injury and death that has been inflicted by medical means on the world’s populations. Indeed for us all, it is very painful and extremely difficult to acknowledge the extent to which authorities and ‘responsible’ individuals are capable of delivering such suffering on fellow human beings. Utterly tragic and totally inexcusable when the scale of the damage becomes undeniable.
Some, like UK cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra and the American doctor Robert Malone (who ironically invented mRNA technology) came to believe they were wrong in giving their original support for the Covid injections. And, unlike many in leadership positions within the Christian church, have had the integrity and humility to admit that they were wrong.
These doctors and many others have since and most recently been sounding the alarm. Yet in spite of this and the appearance of Sudden Adult Death syndrome coupled with the dramatic rise in the excess ‘All Cause Mortality’ figures, the programme rolls on relentlessly.
‘Many seem to doubt the evidence before their own eyes, and exhibited what Bracker termed “double vision”'.
In a book entitled ‘Savage Continent’1 the author Keith Lowe writes of the situation in mainland Europe in the immediate aftermath of World War II. It would seem that – initially at least – the liberating troops were incapable of believing the nature and scale of the Nazi’s genocidal programme. At the beginning of December 1944, a New York Times correspondent Milton Bracker visited Auschwitz. Braker noticed that although many American officers had toured the camp, they still could not bring themselves to accept the full magnitude and detail of the horror.
‘Many seem to doubt the evidence before their own eyes, and exhibited what Bracker termed “double vision” — a condition where they simultaneously saw and did not see the results of German atrocities. According to other contemporary reports the disbelief of American soldiers infuriated the local population when the stories of German crimes were doubted or even scoffed at.’
Lowe’s writing informs us:
‘Such “double vision” came to an end the following April, when the Americans liberated Ohrdruf, one of Buchenwald’s sub- camps. Ohrdruf is particularly important because Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, Supreme Commander of Allied forces in Europe, visited it on 12th April, just a week after it had been discovered.”
It seems that Eisenhower brought with him generals Omar Bradley and George Patton, and insisted on seeing “every nook and cranny” of the camp, “because I felt it my duty to be in a position from then on to testify at first-hand about these things in case they ever grew up at home the belief or assumption that the stories of Nazi brutality was just propaganda”.
What happened 80 years ago in Germany is still being challenged by ‘Holocaust deniers’ today. Why? Is it because of antiSemitism? Or is it because – to use Bracker’s term – ‘double vision’; an inability or denial otherwise described as cognitive dissonance? Do we fool ourselves into thinking that the spirit responsible for the Shoah2 then, is incapable of unleashing a highly-dangerous ‘vaccine’ on the world’s populations today?
"‘Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving – for ever?"
 In that most acclaimed book/film ‘The Third Man’3 by Graham Greene and Carol Reed, one of the main characters Harry Lime, is profiting by illicitly pedalling stolen and then-diluted penicillin in post-war Vienna. His egregious black-market dealings were maiming and killing countless infants with meningitis. In order to avoid police capture, Lime faked his own death.
However his journalist friend Holly Martins comes to realise that – as if a parody of Jesus – Lime had ‘risen again’. However, in contrast to Jesus, he was killing rather than saving. The two erstwhile school friends eventually agree to meet, and board the giant Wiener Riesenrad ferris wheel in the Leopoldstadt district’s bombed-out amusement park.
At the top of the ride, the pair stop and look down on the ‘tiny dots’ of people far below. Martins then challenges Lime regarding the consequences of what the latter is doing. The script carries Lime’s response:
Look down there,’ [Lime] went on, pointing through the window at the people moving like black flies at the base of the Wheel. ‘Would you really feel any pity if one of those dots stopped moving – for ever? If I said you can have twenty thousand pounds for every dot that stops, would you really, old man, tell me to keep my money – without hesitation? Or would you calculate how many dots you could afford to spare? Free of income tax, old man. Free of income tax.’ He gave his boyish conspiratorial smile. ‘It’s the only way to save nowadays.’
In this chilling scene, Lime is a 20th-century equivalent of the devil’s ambassador; taking Martins to a high place to survey the world – alternately threatening and tempting him (cf Matt. 4:1 – 10). "Nobody thinks in terms of human beings," Lime says in justification of his penicillin racket. "Governments don’t, so why should we?" These cynical lines are spoken in the shadow of the industrialised killings of Nazi Germany, and the soon-after blinding flashes and unprecedented devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Graham Greene was arguably a moralist troubled by human turpitude and the evil of that time. In 1951 he wrote:
"Today the human body is regarded as expendable material, something to be eliminated wholesale by the atom bomb, a kind of anonymous carrion."
" ....testified regarding the Covid virus and the ‘vaccines’ themselves as being bioweapons".
The highly-credentialled and respected Drs. Richard Fleming and Peter McCullough have respectively testified regarding the Covid virus and the ‘vaccines’ themselves as being bioweapons. Is it as impossible now as it was in 1945 for most decent and law-abiding citizens to make the mental leap and believe that such things could ever be? However, as we can read for ourselves throughout God’s word (Dan. 3:21; 6:16) and right through to the 20th-century Nuremberg trials, there is plainly no limit to what fallen man can be capable of and inspired to do.
I hear of many responses and proposed actions from secular observers regarding a means of countering what we are seeing; but I find these ‘solutions’ neither feasible nor compelling. Meanwhile the Christian community is almost totally mute. However, in the cadre of truth-seeking believers which recognises the dynamic, I hear the cry – more and more: “Jesus has to come back”. The Saviour the world has assured us he will indeed return (Matt 24:30). Let’s pray that it will be some day soon.
Article Notes:
-
Keith Lowe (2013); Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II
-
‘Shoah’ is the Hebrew word for the Nazi Judeocide of the Holocaust
-
Carol Reed/Graham Greene (1949/50); The Third Man
------------------------
POSTSCRIPT:
 When the damage being inflicted by the medical treatments started to emerge, I discovered that there was a widespread reluctance, even refusal, to accept what was increasingly apparent. I published an article entitled 'Which is You?' as an analytical framework inviting anyone who reads it to think through their position. The question still stands.
In general terms, the vast majority frontline physicians seem to have abandoned their medical ethics, broken the Hippocratic Oath and failed to employ informed consent. Dr. David Cartland has issued a heartfelt plea to his fellow doctors; "begging and imploring [them] to do the 'right thing'" in terms of the life-threatening harms and injuries he is experiencing in his daily work. In February, 2024, he speaks of "people in their 30s having strokes 24 hours after having the jabs" and of a woman with "metastatic cancer" who has two children. Elsewhere he is seeing the damage in areas of childbirth and male fertility levels.
---------------------------------
Sorry, your browser is unable to play this type of file.
You can still download it
|
Print